Praful was exhausted, his boss sent honest feedback, and he hit reply before he had processed his anger. His story is the clearest lesson I teach on Self-Control — the fourth trait on the EQ side of the Winning Kite.

Praful had been working late nights for weeks. He was exhausted, stretched thin, and running on fumes. When his boss sent honest, constructive feedback on a project he had poured himself into, Praful didn't read it as help — he read it as an attack. He fired back a rude, defensive email. The moment he hit send, he knew he had made a mistake. But by then it was too late.
In shortIn the Winning Kite (KITE Leadership Framework), I map every professional trait onto four sides of a kite: the top is Success, the left is EQ (Emotional Intelligence), the right is RQ (Relationship Intelligence), and the bottom is PQ (Productivity). You rise on balance across all three, not on strength in just one. Self-Control is the fourth trait on the EQ — left — side, and it is unusual among the traits because it doesn't just affect EQ. When self-control collapses, it drags the whole kite down with it: RQ deteriorates because relationships get damaged by outbursts, and PQ suffers because impulsive decisions and unfinished commitments pile up. Praful's story shows exactly how fast that collapse can happen — in the time it takes to type one email.
Praful was a working professional under real pressure. For several weeks he had been putting in long hours, staying back late, carrying a workload that was steadily wearing him down. He wasn't lazy or careless — quite the opposite. He cared enough about his project to lose sleep over it. That is exactly what made him vulnerable.
Then his boss sent an email. It contained constructive feedback — the kind every manager is supposed to give, the kind that, on a rested day, Praful might have read calmly and even appreciated. But Praful wasn't having a rested day. He was already on edge, running low on patience, and the feedback landed on a mind that had no reserves left to absorb it gently.
He read it as unfair. As criticism, not coaching. And before he gave himself even a minute to think it through, he typed out a harsh, defensive reply and hit send.
The relief of “getting it off his chest” lasted only seconds. Almost immediately afterward, the adrenaline faded and clarity returned — and with it, dread. He realised what he had just done. The email couldn't be recalled. It sat in his boss's inbox, in black and white, timestamped, impossible to walk back with an apology alone.
The practical damage followed quickly. His relationship with his manager took a hit — trust doesn't rebuild in a day. His standing with his team was affected too, because word of an “angry reply to the boss” travels fast in any office. And Praful was left carrying something heavier than the original stress: guilt. Guilt that the whole episode had been avoidable, if only he had waited an hour before responding.
Psychologists call what happened to Praful emotional hijacking — a useful term borrowed from the world of emotional intelligence research (echoing Daniel Goleman's popular framing of the amygdala hijack) that I use constantly in my corporate sessions because it makes the biology visible.
Picture two boxers in a ring inside your brain. The first is a heavyweight: your emotional brain, centred on the amygdala. It's fast, powerful, and reactive. The moment it senses a threat — real or only perceived — it floods your body with stress hormones like adrenaline and cortisol. Your heart races, your muscles tense, and crucially, your rational thinking gets pushed aside.
The second boxer is a featherweight: your rational brain, seated in the prefrontal cortex. It is slower and quieter, but it is the part that thinks through consequences, weighs options, and holds impulses in check. In an ordinary moment, the featherweight can reason with the heavyweight and keep things balanced. But under extreme stress, anger, fear or humiliation, the heavyweight simply overpowers the featherweight — grabs it by the throat, so to speak — and takes over completely. That is emotional hijacking: your feelings running the show while logic gets kicked out of the cockpit, like a hijacker taking over a plane.
This is precisely the mechanism behind Praful's email. Weeks of exhaustion had already worn down his rational reserves. The feedback was the trigger. The amygdala took the wheel, the reply was fired off, and the featherweight brain only caught up after the damage was already sent.
I tell Praful's story alongside a companion story in the same chapter: Sandesh's Sudden Resignation. Sandesh had been unhappy at his job for months. After one particularly difficult meeting, he felt so overwhelmed that he walked straight into his manager's office and quit on the spot — no plan, no backup, pure impulse. It was only later, with bills to pay and a family depending on him, that he understood how badly an impulsive decision could hurt him financially and professionally. If he had paused, or spoken to a mentor first, he might have handled it very differently.
Both Praful and Sandesh show the same pattern: strong emotion, zero pause, a decision made in seconds that took weeks or months to try to repair — if it could be repaired at all. Neither man is a bad employee. Both are simply human beings whose self-control ran out at the exact wrong moment.
And this is not only an office phenomenon. I use sport and public life to make the same point land harder in my workshops. Zinedine Zidane, playing the very last match of his career in the 2006 FIFA World Cup final, head-butted Marco Materazzi after an exchange of words — and was sent off, ending his career on a red card instead of a trophy. Mike Tyson, in the infamous 1997 “Bite Fight,” let one landed punch reignite old rage and bit off a piece of Evander Holyfield's ear, undoing months of preparation in one disqualifying second. Closer to home, KKR captain Gautam Gambhir and MI's Ambati Rayudu nearly came to blows on the field during a 2017 IPL match after an insult about family — both were fined. And tragically, in 2018 a teenager in Delhi shot a businessman dead after a road-rage dispute over being overtaken — the most extreme, irreversible cost emotional hijacking can carry.
On the other side of the ledger sit the professionals who kept their composure when it mattered most. Rahul Dravid earned the nickname “The Wall” not only for his batting technique but for his emotional discipline against the fastest bowlers in the world. MS Dhoni built a reputation as “Captain Cool” by staying composed through the tensest run-chases of his career. And Cheteshwar Pujara, during India's historic 2020–21 Test series win in Australia, absorbed blow after blow from Australian pacers at Brisbane and refused even painkillers, fearing they would dull his focus — his self-control, as much as his skill, helped India win the series 2-1.
A lot of people misunderstand self-control as pushing your emotions down and pretending they don't exist. That is not it, and it doesn't work — suppressed emotions tend to leak out somewhere else, often worse. Think instead of driving a car: you have a brake and an accelerator, and you know when to use each one. Self-control is not the absence of an accelerator. It is knowing when to press the brake.
Even in high-pressure situations — money problems, work stress, relationship friction — people with self-control can pause and prevent the negative emotion from driving the behaviour. They remain calm enough to make a clear decision instead of a reactive one. Praful had every reason to feel frustrated by the feedback. Feeling frustrated was not the problem. Replying from inside that frustration, without the brake, was.
I often contrast two employees facing the identical high-pressure moment. Employee A, with low self-control, loses temper easily, sends angry emails in the heat of the moment, snaps at colleagues under stress, gets defensive when receiving feedback, and lets personal stress spill into professional behaviour. Employee B, with high self-control, stays calm under the same pressure, pauses before responding to a difficult email, manages stress without offloading it onto others, and receives feedback professionally without becoming defensive.
Both employees can have identical skills and identical qualifications on paper. But it is Employee B who gets trusted with bigger responsibilities, promoted faster, and respected more widely — because self-control, not talent alone, is what colleagues and managers remember under pressure.
If self-control were purely a matter of willpower, Praful would simply have “tried harder.” But the deeper cause is almost always a lack of emotional awareness combined with depleted reserves. You cannot control what you don't first recognise, and chronic stress — like Praful's weeks of late nights — exhausts the rational brain long before the actual trigger event arrives. Add repeated setbacks, poor coping habits, and a bruised ego that reads feedback as a personal attack, and the explosion becomes almost inevitable.
The practical fix borrows an idea popularised by executive coach Marshall Goldsmith: your environment and your triggers shape your behaviour more than raw willpower does. Most people react to a trigger automatically — trigger, then reaction, with no thought and no choice in between. The goal is to insert two things into that gap: awareness, then choice. Trigger, then impulse, then awareness, then choice, then response. That small gap between impulse and action is exactly where self-control lives — and it is exactly the gap Praful skipped.
In practice, that means: know your personal triggers ahead of time (the colleague who argues, the client who complains, the boss who critiques in public). When you feel the impulse rising, pause — breathe, count to ten, or simply save the email as a draft and revisit it an hour later instead of sending it immediately. Reframe the situation in your head (“they're attacking me” becomes “they're giving me feedback to help me improve”). Build healthy outlets — exercise, a short walk, journaling — so stress has somewhere to go before it explodes in a meeting or an inbox. And protect your sleep and rest, because an exhausted rational brain, like Praful's after weeks of late nights, is a rational brain that loses far more easily to the emotional one.
This foundation-first approach is why, in the Stars at India Inc. framework, self-control is built on top of the earlier EQ traits — Emotional Awareness and Accurate Self-Assessment. You cannot pause for a feeling you don't yet recognise in yourself. I've also compiled deeper self-reflection questions on this in my earlier book, The Unanswered, for readers who want to dig into their own trigger patterns.
When I run this module in leadership workshops — whether for a corporate team, the Indian Army, or a manufacturing floor — Praful's story is the one that gets the most nods in the room, because almost everyone has a version of it. An email they wish they could unsend. A message typed in frustration at 11 pm. A reply that cost more than it saved. The good news, and the point I close on every time, is that self-control is trainable. It is not a fixed personality trait some people simply have and others don't (a mindset echoed in Carol Dweck's growth-mindset research) — it is a skill, built one paused response at a time.
If you want this worked through with your own managers and teams — real triggers, real pauses, real practice — explore our Signature Corporate Training Programs or browse the full list of corporate training topics, including sessions built specifically around Self-Control and Emotional Intelligence. And if you'd like to see how this trait connects to the ones before and after it in the book, read the companion piece on the Winning Kite framework itself.
Zidane's career ended on a red card, not a trophy, because of a few seconds he could never take back. Praful's email didn't end a career — but it damaged something that took much longer to rebuild than it took to break. Don't let one impulsive message define how your team, your boss, or your career remembers you. The question worth asking yourself is simple: when the next trigger comes, will you be the person who reacts, or the person who responds?
Avinash Chate turns the traits in Stars at India Inc. into live leadership & emotional-intelligence workshops. TEDx speaker · 11+ yrs training Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW & 1000+ leaders.
✅ Thanks! Avinash team will reach out within 24 hours.'}).catch(function(e){f.outerHTML='Something went wrong. WhatsApp +91 8793630001
'});return false;">Select ServiceKeynote / Motivational SpeakingLeadership Development TrainingTeam Building WorkshopManager DevelopmentEmployee TrainingBook Avinash Now →Or WhatsApp directly: +91 87936 30001
Avinash Chate TEDx Speaker · Founder, The Future Corporate · Author of Stars at India Inc. Avinash has trained the Indian Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW Steel and 1000+ corporate leaders across India. His work focuses on leadership, emotional intelligence and behavioural training rooted in Indian values and modern business needs. |
Emotional hijacking is when your emotional brain (the amygdala) overpowers your rational brain (the prefrontal cortex) in a stressful moment, causing you to react impulsively — like sending an angry email or storming out of a meeting — instead of responding thoughtfully. You regret the action almost as soon as it's done.
Praful, exhausted from weeks of overwork, received constructive feedback from his boss and fired off a rude, defensive reply without pausing. The moment he hit send he regretted it — but the damage to his relationship with his manager was already done. The lesson: self-control means inserting a pause between the trigger and the response, especially when you are already running on empty.
Start by identifying your personal triggers — the people, situations and times of day that test you most. When you feel the impulse to react, pause: breathe, count to ten, or save the email as a draft instead of sending it. Reframe the trigger ('they are attacking me' becomes 'they are giving me feedback to help me grow'), and build healthy outlets like exercise or journaling so stress doesn't build up unnoticed.
Self-Control is Trait #4 on the EQ (left) side of the Winning Kite. It acts as a stabiliser: without it, your EQ becomes reactive, your RQ suffers from damaged relationships, and your PQ suffers from impulsive, incomplete decisions. With it, the kite flies steady even in turbulent winds.
Corporate Trainer in Delhi · Top Corporate Trainers in India · Leadership Trainer in Delhi · Top Leadership Trainers in India · Team Building Trainer in Delhi · Top Team Building Trainers in India · Motivational Speaker in Delhi · Top Motivational Speakers in India · All service locations
← Back to all articles · Book Avinash Chate
By Avinash Chate — Maharashtra’s #1 Corporate Trainer & Motivational Speaker. .