Training Design and Development
A course can be beautifully produced, warmly received and still leave the original performance problem exactly where it was.
Your team has done everything the training calendar asked. Needs were collected, vendors were compared, decks were polished, rooms were filled and feedback scores came back looking respectable. Yet the same errors still reach quality, new managers still avoid the same conversation, and the business sponsor asks the question nobody can answer comfortably: what can people do now that they could not do before? Somewhere between the request for a course and the applause at the end, the performance problem got replaced by a content outline. This programme rebuilds that missing discipline — diagnosing before designing, designing for action rather than coverage, and developing every element around what people must actually do back at work.
Across Maharashtra, pan-India & internationally · English, Hindi & Marathi
The Course That Solved the Calendar, Not the Problem
Most weak training does not look weak in the room. The facilitator is credible, the slides are attractive, the activities are pleasant and nobody complains. The weakness was built much earlier, when a manager's request for “communication training” became the needs analysis, when the designer opened last year's deck before asking where performance was breaking, or when a long list of topics was mistaken for a learning journey. By delivery day, enormous effort is being applied to a design whose central assumptions were never tested.
L&D feels the consequences from both sides. Business leaders see cost and time away from work but no reliable operational shift, so training becomes an easy budget to challenge. Participants keep attending programmes that discuss their jobs without helping them perform the difficult parts. And internal designers become production coordinators — chasing content, dates and attendance — when their real value should be diagnosing performance and engineering a change in capability.
Why Content Keeps Winning Over Performance — And How to Reverse It
Training design often begins with the most visible artefact: the presentation. It feels concrete and efficient to start assembling slides, but the deck is a delivery aid, not the design. The real questions come earlier and are less comfortable. Is this actually a training need? What would a competent person do differently? Where does the current process, incentive or manager behaviour prevent that action? Which learners need which part? What practice would reveal whether they can perform it? When those questions are skipped, content expands to fill the uncertainty.
A performance-led process does not make design bureaucratic. It makes decisions cleaner. A clear need tells you what not to build. An observable outcome tells you which activity belongs. A realistic workplace constraint tells you what the learning must survive. Evaluation becomes part of design rather than a form added after lunch. These are learnable design judgements, and they improve fastest when people apply them to a live programme from their own organisation. That is how this workshop is structured.
Does This Sound Familiar?
If your training function is busy but its impact is difficult to explain, look upstream of facilitation. These design signals reveal where the original performance need was lost and which part of the programme addresses it.
| The symptom you see | What it is costing you | The real cause | How the programme fixes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training requests arrive as topic names and are converted directly into course outlines | The organisation buys learning for a problem that may be process, clarity, tools or management instead | Needs collection asks what course people want, not where and why performance is breaking | The Performance Diagnosis module — testing the request before accepting the solution (Module 01) |
| Objectives say “understand”, “learn” or “awareness”, but nobody can define successful application | Designers, facilitators and sponsors each imagine a different result | Outcomes describe exposure to content rather than observable workplace performance | The Outcomes module — writing the destination before selecting content (Module 03) |
| The programme is comprehensive, but participants cannot use its most important parts | Essential practice is crowded out by background, theory and nice-to-know material | The design is organised around the expert's knowledge instead of the learner's decisions and actions | The Learning Architecture module — sequence, practice and progressive challenge (Module 04) |
| Activities create energy but have little connection to the job | People remember the game and forget the capability it was meant to develop | Engagement was added as decoration rather than designed as evidence-producing practice | The Activity and Materials module — making every exercise serve the outcome (Module 05) |
| Feedback is positive, yet the sponsor still asks whether anything changed | L&D cannot demonstrate value and the next programme starts with the same uncertainty | Reaction data is being asked to answer a performance question, with no transfer built into the design | The Transfer and Evaluation module — evidence, application and review (Module 06) |
What Changes When Design Starts With Monday Morning
Picture the next training request arriving. Instead of opening a slide template, your designer sits with the sponsor and reconstructs the moment performance fails. They observe the work or speak to the people doing it, identify the few decisions and actions that matter, and discover which barriers training can genuinely address. The resulting outline is shorter and sharper. Every section has a reason to exist, and every important outcome has practice attached to it.
The difference continues after delivery. Facilitators receive guides that explain intent rather than merely scripting slides. Participants leave with tools they can use in the workflow. Managers know what to watch for and reinforce. The review conversation includes evidence of application alongside attendance and reaction. L&D stops defending training as a good thing in principle and starts showing the business a clear chain from need to design to changed capability.
What Your Learning Designers Will Be Able to Do
- ✓ Interrogate a training request and distinguish a learning need from other performance barriers
- ✓ Build a practical picture of learners, work context, prior knowledge and delivery constraints
- ✓ Write observable learning outcomes that align sponsors, designers, facilitators and participants
- ✓ Sequence content and practice around workplace performance rather than subject-matter volume
- ✓ Develop activities, facilitator guides, participant tools and assessments that serve the same outcome
- ✓ Design manager involvement, application tasks and review so learning has a route into the job
- ✓ Redesign a real programme using a coherent, reusable design process and clear evaluation evidence
What the Programme Covers
Seven modules follow the actual life of a corporate programme, from the first ambiguous request to evaluation and revision. Participants bring a live or recently delivered course and rebuild it as they learn. The result is not just knowledge of instructional-design terminology, but a stronger programme and a repeatable way to make design decisions.
These are building blocks, not a fixed-length course. A two-hour session goes deep on the two or three that matter most to you; a half or full day covers more; a multi-day intensive — or an ongoing monthly, quarterly or half-yearly rhythm — works through them all, with far more practice. We shape which ones, in what order and how deep, with you.
Diagnose the Performance Need Before Designing
What we cover: Turning “we need a course on…” into a useful diagnostic conversation. Describing current and desired performance in observable terms. Finding where the gap appears, for whom and under which conditions. Distinguishing missing knowledge or skill from unclear expectations, weak process, unsuitable tools, incentives and manager reinforcement. Using sponsor interviews, learner input, work artefacts and observation proportionately. Recommending when training is appropriate, when it is only part of the answer, and when another intervention should come first.
What changes: Designers stop accepting the requested course as the problem statement and gain a defensible basis for deciding what should be built — or not built.
Understand the Learner and the Real Work Context
What we cover: Building a useful learner picture without reducing people to generic personas. Mapping prior knowledge, confidence, language, role variation and the errors beginners actually make. Understanding the environment in which learning must transfer: shift patterns, customer pressure, systems access, manager support and the cost of mistakes. Separating must-know prerequisites from content experts find interesting. Identifying accessibility, facilitation and delivery constraints early enough to design around them.
What changes: The programme begins to fit the people and workplace it serves, rather than expecting them to adapt to an idealised classroom design.
Write Outcomes That Drive Design Decisions
What we cover: Translating a performance need into a small set of observable learning outcomes. Replacing vague verbs with actions a facilitator can see and a learner can attempt. Clarifying conditions and an appropriate standard without turning objectives into bureaucratic prose. Aligning organisational sponsor, subject expert and facilitator around the same destination. Using outcomes to cut irrelevant content, select practice and decide what evidence would show learning.
What changes: Every later choice — content, activity, material and assessment — has a clear test against a shared, observable destination.
Build the Learning Architecture and Practice Sequence
What we cover: Sequencing from existing experience to new challenge rather than following the textbook chapter order. Deciding what belongs in pre-work, live learning, guided practice and independent application. Breaking complex performance into manageable decisions and actions, then recombining them. Designing demonstrations, worked examples, realistic scenarios, feedback and repeated attempts. Balancing conceptual explanation with the time learners need to do the thing. Creating a coherent programme map before any slides are produced.
What changes: The course becomes a deliberate route to capability, with practice at its centre instead of content followed by a hurried exercise.
Develop Activities, Materials and Facilitator Support
What we cover: Designing activities that reveal thinking and create useful evidence, not just energy. Writing scenario briefs, case material, job aids, worksheets and participant instructions that are clear outside the designer's head. Building facilitator guides that explain purpose, timing flexibility, questions, likely misconceptions and debrief points. Deciding what belongs on a slide and what belongs in a usable workplace tool. Supporting consistent delivery when another facilitator or subject-matter expert takes over.
What changes: The design survives handover: another competent facilitator can deliver its intent, and participants leave with materials that help them perform rather than merely remember.
Design Transfer and Evaluation Into the Programme
What we cover: Choosing evidence appropriate to the outcome rather than relying on satisfaction alone. Building knowledge or skill checks into meaningful practice. Planning application assignments, manager conversations, peer review and follow-up while the programme is being designed. Separating evidence of reaction, learning, application and operational contribution so claims stay honest. Deciding what can realistically be measured with available access and data. Using evaluation findings to revise the programme rather than merely report on it.
What changes: Learning has an explicit path into work, and L&D can discuss what changed with appropriate evidence instead of overstating what a feedback form proves.
Design Studio — Rebuild a Real Programme
What we cover: Applying the full process to each participant's own course: sharpening the need, defining the audience, rewriting outcomes, cutting content, mapping practice and specifying transfer. Peer review focused on whether another person can follow the design logic. Testing one activity or assessment with the group. Reconciling sponsor expectations with learner reality. Producing a concise design brief and development plan that can be taken back to stakeholders and subject experts.
What changes: Participants leave with a substantially redesigned programme, not only templates, and have practised defending the decisions behind it.
How It Is Delivered
This is a design studio rather than a lecture about instructional design. Participants work on real requests, outlines, activities and materials from their organisation. Short inputs introduce decision tools; individual and group work applies them immediately; peer review exposes gaps that are difficult to see in your own design. Subject-matter experts and experienced L&D professionals can work together productively because the focus stays on observable performance and learner evidence.
The programme can run as a half-day or full-day foundation, a multi-day design intensive, or a modular series with development work between sessions. A series is especially useful when participants return with stakeholder findings and test materials for review. It can also support an ongoing L&D capability rhythm, including design clinics for live projects. Group size and format are arranged so each participant receives meaningful feedback on actual work.
Formats That Fit Your Calendar
Half-day or full-day foundation
A practical introduction to performance-led design for HR, L&D and experts who currently build courses mainly from content.
Multi-day design intensive
Extended studio time to diagnose, map, develop and test a real programme with detailed feedback and revision.
Modular design-and-development series
Participants complete stakeholder research and material development between sessions, returning for structured design reviews.
Ongoing L&D design clinics
A recurring capability rhythm for internal teams, combining shared design standards with review of current projects as they evolve.
Planning this for your learning designers?
Share your name and WhatsApp number and you will get a reply within one business day — usually the same day. Or call directly, most dates are settled on a phone call.
Prefer to talk now? ☎ +91 87936 30001 · WhatsApp · Email
The Thinking Behind It
The programme translates established performance-consulting, adult-learning and instructional-design principles into a practical corporate workflow. It avoids turning design into a template-completion exercise: the quality lies in the questions, trade-offs and evidence. Avinash's facilitation adds the perspective of someone who designs and delivers for real organisational audiences, helping participants make useful choices under imperfect information, limited access and genuine business pressure.
Built on frameworks you will not find anywhere else
Beyond the established thinking, this programme is built on frameworks Avinash has created and written about himself — his KITE Leadership Framework, The Winning Kite, and the principles in his books The Winning Edge and Stars at India Inc. They come from actually running a 100-plus member organisation and developing its people year after year, not from a textbook. It is the layer competitors cannot copy, and the one your learning designers remember long after the session ends.
What is deliberately not published here is the method itself. The diagnostics, the scoring instruments and the individual components are worked through in the room, with your learning designers.
Who It Is For
Corporate L&D and HR professionals responsible for selecting, shaping or commissioning programmes; internal instructional designers; subject-matter experts asked to create courses; and trainers who want stronger control over what happens before delivery. It is valuable for organisations building internal academies, standardising leadership or technical pathways, or trying to improve the return from an already busy training calendar. Mixed cohorts work particularly well because sponsors, designers and experts can finally examine the same performance problem from one shared process.
Grounded in Programmes That Must Work Beyond the Slide Deck
Avinash Chate is an entrepreneur, TEDx speaker and author of The Winning Edge who runs a 100-plus member organisation and works with corporate learners across sectors. His design perspective comes from both sides of the room: understanding what a sponsor needs to change and what participants will actually use. Programmes and facilitator-development work across manufacturing, IT, sales and services inform a practical approach that respects subject expertise while refusing to confuse content coverage with workplace capability.
Why Avinash Chate
Avinash Chate is the owner of the personal speaking and training practice represented on this website, an entrepreneur, TEDx speaker and published author. He also owns and operates ABC Trainings and The Future Corporate as separate businesses with their own brands and course catalogues. The programmes on this page are Avinash Chate's personal corporate-training offerings; through his personal practice, he has trained teams at 80-plus organisations and 25,541-plus professionals.
He teaches these skills not from a manual, but because he practises them himself — leading a 100-plus member team of his own. That is the difference working leaders feel in the room.
Training Design and Development — FAQ
What is Training Design and Development?
It is the discipline of deciding what learning intervention is needed and then building it around observable workplace performance. Design covers diagnosis, learner context, outcomes, sequence, practice and evaluation. Development turns those decisions into activities, facilitator support, participant materials and assessments. This programme teaches both as one connected process, so a polished course is never mistaken for a well-designed one.
Who should attend?
L&D and HR professionals, instructional designers, internal trainers and subject-matter experts who create or commission corporate learning. It is particularly useful when a team produces many programmes but struggles to show application, or when experts supply large amounts of content and designers need a way to turn it into a coherent learner experience. No formal instructional-design qualification is assumed.
Will participants work on a real course from our organisation?
Yes, that is the preferred approach. Each participant or team brings a live request, existing outline or recently delivered programme and improves it throughout the workshop. The final design studio brings the work together into a design brief and development plan. Using real material exposes the actual trade-offs around stakeholders, content and transfer that generic case studies tend to hide.
Does the programme teach training needs analysis?
Yes, but as performance diagnosis rather than a survey asking people which courses they want. Participants learn to describe the performance gap, identify where it occurs and examine whether knowledge or skill is really the barrier. They also consider process, expectations, tools, incentives and manager support, so training is recommended only where it can make a useful contribution.
What are the main modules?
The seven modules cover performance diagnosis; learner and work-context analysis; observable outcomes; learning architecture and practice; activities, materials and facilitator support; transfer and evaluation; and a design studio rebuilding a real programme. Together they follow the full path from an ambiguous request to a coherent design that can be developed, delivered and reviewed.
Is this about classroom training only?
No. The same performance-led decisions apply to classroom, virtual, digital and blended learning. The programme focuses on choosing the right experience for the outcome and context rather than treating any channel as inherently superior. Where a digital or blended component is useful, its role in preparation, practice, reinforcement or application is designed explicitly.
How does this differ from Train-the-Trainer?
Train-the-Trainer primarily develops delivery and facilitation: how to run a room, engage learners and explain material effectively. Training Design and Development works upstream on what should be built and why. There is a natural overlap around practice and transfer, and many internal teams benefit from both. Designers who also facilitate gain a more complete end-to-end capability.
How is the programme delivered and how flexible is the duration?
It is workshop-based, with real design work, peer review and material testing. It can be a half-day or full-day foundation, a multi-day intensive or a modular series with project work between sessions. Ongoing design clinics are also possible for an internal L&D team. The right format depends on whether you need shared foundations or a substantially developed course by the end.
Can delivery be on-site and in local languages?
Yes. Sessions are available across Maharashtra, including Pune, Mumbai, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Nashik, Nagpur and industrial locations, as well as pan-India and internationally on request. English, Hindi, Marathi or a natural mix can be used. Design concepts remain rigorous, while examples and discussion can reflect the language and working context of your learners.
What tangible output will participants leave with?
Participants leave with a clearer diagnosis, sharper outcomes, a revised learning map and practical decisions about activities, materials, transfer and evaluation for a real programme. In deeper formats they also test components and produce a development plan. The exact completeness depends on available stakeholder information and format, but the emphasis is always on usable design work rather than notes alone.
Related Training Topics
Build training around the performance you actually need
Give your L&D team and subject experts a practical process for diagnosis, outcomes, practice, materials, transfer and evaluation — using a real programme from your organisation. Available across Maharashtra, pan-India and internationally.
Request a Proposal →