Feedback Models: How to Give Feedback People Act On
The three feedback models from Stars at India Inc. - Descriptive, the Feedback Matrix and the Sandwich Model - so the feedback you give actually gets acted on.
Most managers think their job is to have the feedback. It isn't. Your job is to deliver it in a way the other person can actually pick up and use. I have watched brilliant leaders shatter a good employee with one careless "No", and I have watched a single sentence of specific praise turn a struggling junior into a star. The difference was never honesty. It was the model.
In short- Feedback is not about being right - it is about being received. No feedback and harsh feedback both demotivate; only constructive feedback lifts performance.
- Model 1 - Descriptive, not judgmental: drop "good/bad/right/wrong". Name the specific behaviour and the reason.
- Model 2 - The Feedback Matrix: every "Yes" or "No" must carry a reason or a suggestion, or it turns destructive.
- Model 3 - The Sandwich: positive, then the honest correction, then belief - so the mind stays open to hear the hard part.
- Good feedback lifts two sides of your Winning Kite at once: Relationship (RQ) and Productivity (PQ).
Where this sits on your Winning Kite
Feedback is Tool #8 on the Relationship side of The Winning Kite (KITE Leadership Framework). Picture the kite: the top is Success, the left side is EQ, the right side is RQ (Relationship Quotient), and the bottom is PQ (Productivity). Feedback is one of the rare tools that pulls on two sides at once. Delivered well, it deepens trust (RQ) and raises output (PQ), and your kite climbs on that balance. Delivered badly, it snaps the line - the person stops trusting you and stops performing. That is why I treat feedback as a skill to be trained, not a mood to be indulged.
Feedback is a tool, not a verdict
In the Mahabharata, Arjuna froze on the battlefield - full of doubt, ready to put down his bow. He did not lack talent; he lacked belief in that moment. What changed him was not a scolding. Krishna reminded him of his strengths and his purpose, and Arjuna rose to become the warrior the day needed. That is the whole point of feedback. Your team members are Arjunas with hidden capability. The right words unlock them. The wrong words leave them frozen.
A psychologist at Stanford ran a clean experiment on this. Undergraduates were split into three groups. Group A got no feedback. Group B got negative feedback. Group C got positive feedback. The result every manager should tattoo on their memory: both the no-feedback group and the negative-feedback group ended up demotivated. Harsh feedback crushed their confidence; silence made them feel invisible and unappreciated. Only genuine, constructive feedback moved people forward.
Read that again, because it destroys two comfortable habits at once. The manager who stays silent - "I don't need to praise people for doing their job" - is quietly demotivating the team as surely as the one who tears strips off them. As a manager, team leader or sales head, your job is to spot strengths, acknowledge effort, and then guide the improvement - not to prove how sharp your criticism can be.
Ganguly and Yuvraj: the feedback that built a legend
Here is the story I always tell. A young Yuvraj Singh comes into the Indian side under Sourav Ganguly. He has obvious talent, but he struggles in the early matches and is close to being dropped. The easy move for a captain is a public rollicking - or a quiet axing. Ganguly did neither. He sat Yuvraj down, talked through his game, reminded him of exactly what he was good at, told him to keep working, and gave him specific pointers on what to fix. That belief - backed by detail - reshaped Yuvraj's career. He went on to become one of India's greatest match-winners. Same player, same talent; a different feedback style turned a near-drop into a legend. That is what descriptive, supportive feedback can do inside your own team next quarter.
Model 1 - Descriptive, not judgmental
The most common mistake I see in Indian offices is judgmental feedback - the short verdict. "Good." "Bad." "Right." "Wrong." "Not up to the mark." These feel like feedback, but they carry almost no information the person can act on. Descriptive feedback does the opposite: it names the specific behaviour, points to what worked or fell short, and shows the way to improve.
Even your praise should be descriptive. Don't just say "excellent" and walk off. Say: "Great job finishing the project ahead of schedule - I really appreciate the extra effort you put in to get it done on time." Or: "Your presentation was fantastic - the way you organised the information and engaged the audience genuinely made an impact." When you name what they did, the appreciation lands, and - just as importantly - they know exactly which behaviour to repeat.
For corrective feedback, replace the verdict with the reason. Instead of "That was a terrible presentation," say: "Your presentation lacked structure and key information, which made it hard for the audience to follow." Instead of "Your performance was not up to the mark," say: "Your overall work was good; the two areas to sharpen are attention to detail and accuracy." Same honesty. But now it is an instruction, not an insult. The rule is simple: never leave a "no", a "bad" or a "rejected" naked - always attach the why. Descriptive is what makes feedback constructive.
Model 2 - The Feedback Matrix
The second model gives you a map to check yourself before you speak. Draw two axes. One axis runs from positive to negative (was the news good or bad?). The other axis runs from constructive to destructive (did you add value or not?). That produces four quadrants.
Picture the everyday scene: your team walks in and presents an idea, a proposal, a design. How you respond decides which quadrant you land in.
| Your response | Type | Effect on the team |
|---|---|---|
| "No" - with a clear reason | Type A - negative & constructive | They understand and can improve. |
| "No" - no explanation | Type B - negative & destructive | Morale and motivation drop. |
| "Yes" - with suggestions & added value | Type C - positive & constructive | They feel backed and have room to grow. |
| "Yes" - flat, no value added | Type D - positive but destructive | Approval, but no path forward. |
The surprise for most managers is Type D. You would swear that saying "Yes" is always safe. It isn't. A bare "Yes, fine, go ahead" with no guidance is destructive because it leaves no room to improve - it just rubber-stamps and moves on. The lesson of the matrix is blunt: whether your answer is yes or no, add a reason or a suggestion. That single habit keeps you in the constructive column. This is exactly the model the judges use at Toastmasters International, where I have spent years watching nervous first-time speakers grow - the whole system runs on constructive evaluation, not verdicts.
Model 3 - The Sandwich Model
The third model is the one people can use even in a tense moment. The Sandwich Model has three layers: open with genuine positives, place the honest correction in the middle like the patty, and close with encouragement and belief in the person.
Why bother with the bread? Because of a blind spot built into all of us. We accept criticism far more easily when we are in a positive, receptive state than when we feel attacked. Lead with what the person genuinely did well and you lower their defences enough for the real message to get through. Then deliver the correction cleanly - no hedging, but no cruelty. Finally, close with belief: "You have the ability to nail this, and I know you will." That last layer is not fluff; it converts criticism into confidence.
I will be honest about the mistake to avoid: a sandwich with fake bread is worse than no sandwich at all. If your opening praise is invented, people smell it instantly and the whole thing reads as manipulation. The positives must be true. Done right - and this is why Toastmasters trains every evaluator in it - the Sandwich Model builds self-awareness and self-belief in the same conversation.
A quick before-and-after
In the book I walk through a program manager who rose on technical brilliance but was wrecking his team on the people side - brutally honest in public, hurtful remarks, only ever scolding. Top management wanted to promote him to run a business unit; the problem was that if they did, several key people would quit. His fix started exactly here: adopt the Sandwich Approach, keep the honesty but soften the language, stop the blaming and the condescension, and accept that feedback is an art and part of the job. Same man, same standards - a different delivery model, and suddenly he is promotable instead of poisonous.
The six rules that sit under all three models
Whichever model you reach for, these hold every time:
- Be specific. Point at the exact behaviour, not a vague impression.
- Use positive, constructive language. Offer the improvement, don't just condemn the mistake.
- Attack the behaviour, not the person. "The report missed the deadline" - never "you are careless".
- Mind the timing. Give it when the person is actually open to hearing it, not mid-crisis or in front of a crowd.
- Watch your tone. Stay neutral and professional; the moment you get emotional, the message is lost.
- Invite self-reflection. Ask them what they would change, rather than only issuing instructions.
Daniel Goleman's work on emotional intelligence makes the same point from another angle - the emotionally intelligent leader manages the relationship in which feedback is heard, not just the content. That instinct sits right at the heart of my Winning Kite: your EQ decides whether your feedback ever gets picked up. If this chapter helped, the sibling piece on emotional awareness shows how to manage your own state before you open your mouth to give feedback.
Try this at your next review
Pick one person you need to correct this week. Before you speak, run the checklist: name a real strength (bread), state the specific behaviour and its reason (patty), close with genuine belief (bread) - and make sure your "no" or your "yes" carries a suggestion so you stay in the constructive column. Do that for a month and watch what happens: people stop bracing when you call them in, and they start acting on what you say. That is the whole game. If you want your managers trained to do this consistently, that is exactly what we build in our Signature Programs and across our corporate training topics. Questions about running it for your team? Talk to us.
Bring These Ideas to Your Team
Avinash Chate turns the traits in Stars at India Inc. into live leadership & emotional-intelligence workshops. TEDx speaker · 11+ yrs training Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW & 1000+ leaders.
✅ Thanks! Avinash team will reach out within 24 hours.'}).catch(function(e){f.outerHTML='Something went wrong. WhatsApp +91 8793630001
'});return false;">Select ServiceKeynote / Motivational SpeakingLeadership Development TrainingTeam Building WorkshopManager DevelopmentEmployee TrainingBook Avinash Now →Or WhatsApp directly: +91 87936 30001
Work with Avinash Chate
- Signature Corporate Training Programs →
- The Winning Kite (KITE Leadership Framework) →
- All Corporate Training Topics →
Avinash Chate TEDx Speaker · Founder, The Future Corporate · Author of Stars at India Inc. Avinash has trained the Indian Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW Steel and 1000+ corporate leaders across India. His work focuses on leadership, emotional intelligence and behavioural training rooted in Indian values and modern business needs. |
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the three feedback models in Stars at India Inc.?
The book teaches three practical models. The Descriptive Model replaces vague verdicts like "good" or "bad" with specific, behaviour-focused detail. The Feedback Matrix sorts every response into constructive or destructive across positive and negative - the goal is always to add a reason or a suggestion. The Sandwich Model wraps a hard message between two genuine positives so the person stays open enough to actually receive it.
What is the difference between judgmental and descriptive feedback?
Judgmental feedback hands out short verdicts - "good", "bad", "right", "wrong" - which tell people nothing they can act on. Descriptive feedback names the specific behaviour: instead of "terrible presentation" you say "your presentation lacked structure and key information, so the audience found it hard to follow." Descriptive feedback is what turns criticism into a usable instruction.
Does the Sandwich Model really work, or is it manipulation?
It works when the two positives are real. The Sandwich Model exists because of a simple truth about the mind - we accept difficult input far more easily when we are in a positive state than when we feel attacked. Start with genuine strengths, deliver the honest correction in the middle, and close with belief in the person. That is coaching, not flattery.
Where do feedback models sit in Avinash Chate's Winning Kite?
Feedback is the eighth tool on the Relationship Quotient (RQ) - the right side of the Winning Kite - and it directly lifts Productivity (PQ) too, because a team that acts on feedback performs better. Strong feedback strengthens two sides of your kite at once, which is why it lifts your overall Success.
Related Articles by Avinash Chate
- Change Catalyst: Leading People Through Transformation
- Integrity & Trust: Why Credibility Outlasts Popularity
- Mina vs. Arjun – compassionate CEO vs. strict manager
Avinash Chate services
Corporate Training · Leadership Development · Team Building · Motivational Speaking · All service locations
← Back to all articles · Book Avinash Chate
By Avinash Chate — Maharashtra’s #1 Corporate Trainer & Motivational Speaker. .