Govind was everyone's favourite—clients, colleagues, even the boss's kids adored him. So why did his career stall? A story about relationships without results, and the side of your Winning Kite that most charmers ignore.

Govind was one of those people everyone liked. Clients, colleagues, even the security guard smiled wider when he walked in. Years later, he sat confused, wondering why juniors he once mentored had sailed past him. This is the story of a bright kite that never learned to balance—and the one side of your career most charmers quietly ignore.
In shortGovind's story lives on the right side (RQ) and the bottom (PQ) of The Winning Kite (KITE Leadership Framework). Picture your career as a four-sided kite: the top is Success, the left is Emotional Intelligence (EQ), the right is Relationship Intelligence (RQ), and the bottom is Productivity (PQ). Govind's right side was made of silk—strong, beautiful, effortless. But his bottom side was tissue paper. And a kite with one weak side never flies straight for long.
Govind had a natural gift for connection. Birthdays were festivals when he was around—decorations, cakes, laughter echoing across the floor. People waited for him at chai breaks and lunchtime, because with him, time simply flew. He knew every story in the office: who was dating whom, whose kid had won a prize, who had just bought a new car.
He was the boss's favourite party partner, always on the list for every office celebration. During Diwali and Ganpati, you would find Govind at the boss's home, helping with the decorations. The boss's children even called out, “Kaka, Kaka!” the moment he arrived. He had warm relationships with everyone—vendors, customers, bosses, colleagues, subordinates, team members alike.
Govind's RQ was extraordinary. He could build rapport in minutes and smooth over any conflict with a joke. If you needed someone to cool a tense meeting or win over an angry client, Govind was your man. On paper, he looked like exactly the kind of person every company wants.
And that is precisely why his story is worth telling. Because likability, on its own, is not the thing that carries a career.
Here is what stayed hidden behind the charm: Govind's PQ was weak. He spent nine hours in the office and maybe one actually working. The rest went into endless conversations, tea rounds, and what everyone politely called “team bonding.” He was busy—gloriously, sociably busy—but he was not effective.
For a while, his charm covered it up completely. When a report was late, someone would smile and say, “Arre, it's Govind, he'll manage.” When a deadline slipped, his easy apology and warmth made people let it go. Goodwill is a real currency, and Govind had plenty of it in the bank.
But goodwill is a balance you can only draw down, never top up with charm alone. Slowly, the missed deadlines, the late reports, and the growing frustration exposed the gap. People began to see the pattern: Govind was lovely company but poor on delivery. The very quality that made him beloved—that he was always available to chat—was the quality quietly starving his output.
His kite looked bright, but one side, productivity, was paper-thin. And eventually, it tore under its own weight. For a while his kite did fly—high, even colourful—but it was never balanced. When the winds changed, it simply couldn't stay up.
In the years after, Govind kept shifting companies, changing bosses, even trying his hand at business. Each fresh start felt promising. New colleagues loved him within a week. New bosses enjoyed his company. And each time, the same crack reappeared: charm got him in the door, but weak delivery slowly pushed him toward it again.
Nothing truly worked. Not because Govind lacked talent or sincerity—he had plenty of both—but because without balance, no kite can sustain its flight. A career built entirely on relationships is like a kite made of one glorious silk panel and three panels of tissue: gorgeous on the wall, hopeless in the wind.
What breaks my heart about people like Govind is that they are genuinely bewildered when their careers stall. They look around and see juniors promoted past them. They watch people they once helped—people they mentored over chai—move into leadership roles. And they feel confused, even betrayed.
I can almost hear Govind's voice:
“But I helped my boss with Diwali decorations at his home. I organised the Ganpati celebrations. I threw that party when he was going through a tough time. Everyone liked me. My colleagues used to call me their favourite person in the office. How did I end up here—stuck, overlooked, left behind? I built relationships. I was loyal. Why didn't anyone help me when I needed it?”
It is a fair question, asked from real pain. And here is the answer he never realised: relationships without results become friendships, not credibility. And in the workplace, credibility outlasts popularity.
People will happily invite Govind to a party. They will not happily stake their own results on him. When leaders decide who to promote, they are not asking “Who is most fun at chai?” They are asking “Who can I trust to deliver when it matters?” Popularity gets you loved. Credibility gets you trusted. And it is trust, not affection, that carries titles and responsibility.
Let me be very clear, because this is where people misread the lesson: Govind's RQ was not the problem. His relationships were a genuine strength—the kind most people spend years trying to build. The problem was that he leaned entirely on that one side.
The formula at the heart of the Winning Kite is simple:
Success = EQ + PQ + RQ
Now watch what happens when you have only one:
Only balance lets the kite soar high and steady. A famous line from Stephen Covey lands here as gentle supporting colour: the trust you build with people is like an emotional bank account. But even Covey would tell you an account only earns interest if there are real deposits—and in the workplace, delivered results are among the biggest deposits of all. Govind mistook the warmth of the account for the balance in it.
Govind is not alone. In the book I place him beside two others, because together they show every way a kite can lose balance.
Vaishnavi was his opposite—a force of nature, sharp and efficient, with unmatched PQ. Give her a project and she'd finish it early, colour-coded and flawless. But her EQ was fragile. Her temper arrived before her reason. Every few months there was an outburst, a breakdown, a tense scene that left the whole floor uncomfortable—what I call “professional tamasha.” People respected her results but dreaded her reactions, and promotions quietly skipped her. Bosses can handle mistakes; they can't handle meltdowns.
Sumit was the quiet one. His PQ was impeccable—every deadline met, every report perfect—but his RQ was nearly invisible. He believed good work spoke for itself. It didn't. When opportunities came up, his name never surfaced, not because he lacked skill, but because no one thought of him. His kite flew low and steady, hidden under the clouds, unnoticed.
Three talented, sincere people. Three kites that never soared. Govind on the right side, Vaishnavi on the left, Sumit at the bottom—each strong on one panel, each grounded by the panels they ignored. Read Vaishnavi's and Sumit's stories in the companion pieces from this same chapter to see the full picture.
If you recognise a bit of Govind in yourself—and many of the best-liked people in any office do—the good news is that PQ is a skill, not a fixed trait. You do not have to trade away your warmth. You have to add a spine of delivery to it. Here is how I coach people to do exactly that:
Do this, and something powerful happens: the same relationships that once masked your weakness start multiplying your strength. That is a kite that finally flies balanced—and it flies far higher than charm alone ever could.
So look honestly at your own kite. Are you like Govind—great with people but poor on delivery? Somewhere between him, Vaishnavi and Sumit? Wherever you sit, the encouraging truth is that every side can be strengthened. EQ, PQ and RQ are not fixed—they are skills you can build with awareness, effort and practice.
Technical skills might get you hired. But balance—the harmony of EQ, PQ and RQ—decides how high, and how long, you fly. If you want to see how all four sides fit together, start with The Winning Kite framework, and if you'd like this turned into live practice for your team, explore our corporate training topics and signature programs.
Avinash Chate turns the traits in Stars at India Inc. into live leadership & emotional-intelligence workshops. TEDx speaker · 11+ yrs training Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW & 1000+ leaders.
✅ Thanks! Avinash team will reach out within 24 hours.'}).catch(function(e){f.outerHTML='Something went wrong. WhatsApp +91 8793630001
'});return false;">Select ServiceKeynote / Motivational SpeakingLeadership Development TrainingTeam Building WorkshopManager DevelopmentEmployee TrainingBook Avinash Now →Or WhatsApp directly: +91 87936 30001
Avinash Chate TEDx Speaker · Founder, The Future Corporate · Author of Stars at India Inc. Avinash has trained the Indian Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW Steel and 1000+ corporate leaders across India. His work focuses on leadership, emotional intelligence and behavioural training rooted in Indian values and modern business needs. |
Because likability is not the same as credibility. Govind had extraordinary relationships (RQ) but weak productivity (PQ). When one side of your Winning Kite is paper-thin, the kite can't stay up. Relationships without results become friendships, not credibility—and in the workplace, credibility outlasts popularity.
PQ is the bottom side of the Winning Kite—your ability to deliver results, manage time and execute with excellence. Without PQ you are busy, not effective. Govind spent nine hours in the office and maybe one actually working; the rest went into chai rounds and “team bonding.” Strong RQ can hide weak PQ for a while, but not forever.
RQ is never wasted, but RQ alone is unstable. RQ without PQ or EQ makes you popular but unreliable. The goal is balance: EQ + PQ + RQ together. A kite that leans entirely on one side wobbles and eventually crashes, no matter how bright it looks.
Convert relationships into delivery. Protect two to three hours of deep-work time daily, set visible deadlines, and let your PQ ride on your existing RQ—your relationships become distribution for real results, not a substitute for them. PQ is a skill you can build with awareness, discipline and practice.
Corporate Training · Leadership Development · Team Building · Motivational Speaking · All service locations
← Back to all articles · Book Avinash Chate
By Avinash Chate — Maharashtra’s #1 Corporate Trainer & Motivational Speaker. .