When Pakistan captain Sarfaraz Ahmed and his wicketkeeper turned on each other mid-match, one lost temper triggered a chain reaction of misfields, missed catches, and a lost game. Here's what it teaches every team leader about self-control.

A tight match. A misfield. A missed catch. And two senior players — the captain and his own wicketkeeper — turning on each other in front of the whole team instead of the opposition. What followed was not one mistake but a chain of them, and Pakistan lost a match it should have controlled. This is a story about how fast a leader's lost temper can spread through a team, and what self-control actually protects.
In shortSelf-control is Trait #4 on the EQ — the left side — of your Winning Kite (KITE Leadership Framework). A kite needs balance across all four sides — EQ, RQ, PQ and the Success you're chasing at the top — to actually fly. Lose control on one side, even for a few seconds, and the whole kite can come crashing down. Sarfaraz Ahmed's dugout that day is proof.
In a crucial, high-pressure match, Pakistan's captain Sarfaraz Ahmed and the team's wicketkeeper found themselves under enormous stress. The situation was tight — runs were needed, or crucial wickets had to fall, and nerves were already fraying on both sides of the contest before this incident even began.
At the critical moment, Sarfaraz and the wicketkeeper had a misunderstanding. Some accounts point to field placements gone wrong. Others say it was a missed catch or a miscommunication behind the stumps — the kind of split-second confusion that happens in every match, at every level, in every workplace. What made this moment different wasn't the mistake. It was what happened next.
Instead of staying focused on the game, both men let their frustration show — openly, immediately, in front of the entire team and a stadium full of cameras. They started shouting at each other. Blaming each other. The anger that should have lasted three seconds and dissolved into "let's refocus" instead hung in the air and infected everyone around them.
This is the part of the story that matters most for anyone who leads a team. The clash between Sarfaraz and his wicketkeeper didn't stay a two-person problem. As their stress and irritation rose, they started making more mistakes — a misfield here, a missed catch there. The atmosphere on the field turned visibly tense. Other teammates, who had nothing to do with the original disagreement, felt unsettled by it. Instead of pulling together as a unit, the side looked divided.
The frustration and confusion eventually derailed Pakistan's entire game plan. Even simple chances — routine, catchable, the kind fielders take a hundred times in practice — were fumbled because the tension had spread. In the end, those compounding mistakes added up, and the team lost the match. Critics later pointed out that a single moment of anger from the captain and wicketkeeper had triggered a chain reaction of errors that no amount of individual skill could undo.
Think about what that means. Two of the most experienced players on the park, under the same pressure as everyone else, let a three-second flash of anger cost eleven people a match they were positioned to win. That is the real price tag of lost self-control — it is rarely paid by the person who loses it alone.
Psychologists call what happened to Sarfaraz Ahmed and his wicketkeeper emotional hijacking — a term that describes exactly what it feels like. Your feelings completely take over your thoughts and actions, the way a hijacker takes over a plane. Nobody voted for this outcome. Nobody chose it consciously. It simply happened, faster than either man could stop it.
Here's the mechanism, and I explain this in every workshop I run because once people see it, they can't unsee it. Imagine your mind holds two boxers in the same ring. The heavyweight is your emotional brain — the amygdala, your brain's threat-detection centre. It's fast, powerful, and reactive. The moment it senses a threat, real or perceived — a missed catch, a rude email, a colleague taking credit for your work — it floods your body with adrenaline and cortisol. Your heart races. Your muscles tense. And your rational thinking shuts down.
The featherweight is your rational brain — the prefrontal cortex. It's slower, more thoughtful, logical. It's the part of you that weighs consequences and makes good decisions. Under normal conditions, it's perfectly capable of holding its own. But under extreme stress, anger, fear, or humiliation, the heavyweight can knock the featherweight out cold in seconds. That's emotional hijacking. Logic gets kicked out of the cockpit, and your emotions fly the plane.
This is not a Pakistan cricket team problem, and it's not a Sarfaraz Ahmed character flaw. It is universal human wiring. The same mechanism that made Zinedine Zidane head-butt Marco Materazzi in the 2006 FIFA World Cup final — ending his career on a red card in the last match he would ever play — and the same mechanism that made Mike Tyson bite off a piece of Evander Holyfield's ear in their infamous 1997 "Bite Fight," is the mechanism that made two Pakistani cricketers turn on each other mid-match. Different sport, different stakes, identical brain chemistry.
You have almost certainly seen your own version of the Sarfaraz Ahmed moment at work, even if nobody shouted on a cricket field. I think of Praful, who had been feeling overworked for weeks. When his boss sent some entirely constructive feedback on a project, Praful — already on edge — lost his cool and fired back a rude, defensive email. By the time he'd calmed down, he realised the damage was done. His relationship with his manager and his standing with his team both took a hit that took months to repair.
Or Sandesh, who had been unhappy at his job for a long time. After one difficult meeting, the frustration became too much. He quit on the spot and walked out — no plan, no notice, pure impulse. Only later did the financial and career consequences of that walkout sink in. If he had paused, even for a day, or spoken to a mentor before reacting, the outcome could have been completely different.
Multiply this by a team. A manager who snaps at a junior in a status meeting. A salesperson who argues back with an unreasonable client instead of de-escalating. A team lead who sends an all-caps message in the group chat because a deadline slipped. Every one of these is a smaller-stakes version of Sarfaraz Ahmed shouting at his wicketkeeper — and every one of them has the same ripple effect: the anger spreads to people who had nothing to do with the original mistake, and the whole team's output suffers.
Some people think self-control means pushing your emotions down and pretending they don't exist. That's not true, and it's not even healthy. Think of it like driving a car. You have both a brake and an accelerator, and a good driver knows exactly when to use each one. Even in high-pressure situations — money problems, work stress, a missed catch in a must-win match — people with self-control can pause and prevent the negative emotion from controlling their behaviour. They stay calm enough to make a clear decision instead of a reactive one.
If Sarfaraz Ahmed had paused for even three seconds after the misfield — acknowledged the frustration internally, then turned to his wicketkeeper with "let's reset, focus on the next ball" instead of a shout — the entire chain reaction likely never happens. That three-second gap is where self-control lives, and it is trainable.
Leadership coach Marshall Goldsmith frames this well: most people believe self-control is about willpower, gritting your teeth and forcing good behaviour. It isn't. It's about managing your triggers. The old, automatic model is Trigger → Reaction — no thought, no choice, a pure reflex. The model that separates star performers from everyone else inserts two steps: Trigger → Impulse → Awareness → Choice → Response. The moment you feel the impulse to react, you pause, notice what you're feeling, and then choose your response. That pause is the entire skill.
Compare two employees under the exact same pressure. One loses temper easily, fires off angry messages in the heat of the moment, gets defensive when receiving feedback, and lets personal stress spill into professional behaviour. The other stays calm even when frustrated, pauses before responding to a difficult email, manages stress without taking it out on colleagues, and receives feedback professionally. Both might have identical skills on paper. But only one of them gets trusted with the next big responsibility, the next promotion, the next high-stakes client. Self-control is what management actually watches for when nobody's coaching you through the moment.
Developing self-control starts with emotional awareness and honest self-assessment. When you understand your own feelings and recognise your personal triggers — the specific situations that reliably spike your frustration, whether it's a rushed meeting, an end-of-day discussion, or a high-pressure deadline — you're in a far better position to handle the moment calmly when it arrives. You cannot manage what you don't first notice.
A simple three-step exercise I use in workshops: pick two or three behavioural goals ("stay calm when receiving critical feedback," "don't lose my temper in a tense meeting"). List your known triggers for each. Then, the next time that trigger fires, deliberately insert the pause — awareness before choice, choice before response. It feels awkward the first few times. It becomes instinctive with practice, the same way Rahul Dravid's famous composure at the crease or MS Dhoni's calm captaincy through nail-biting finishes wasn't accidental talent — it was a trained response to exactly the kind of pressure that undid Sarfaraz Ahmed and his wicketkeeper that day.
When a working professional masters self-control, it strengthens their Emotional Quotient — the EQ side of the Winning Kite. A strong EQ doesn't just help you personally avoid an emotional hijack. As a leader, it protects your entire team from the ripple effect of your own bad moment. That's the real lesson from the Sarfaraz Ahmed story: the captain's temper wasn't just his problem. It became everyone's problem, on the scoreboard, within minutes.
If you're building this capability across a leadership team, I run this exact case study — alongside Zidane, Tyson, and the workplace examples above — inside our Signature Corporate Training Programs, and it connects directly to the broader leadership and EQ training topics we deliver for corporate teams across India.
Avinash Chate turns the traits in Stars at India Inc. into live leadership & emotional-intelligence workshops. TEDx speaker · 11+ yrs training Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW & 1000+ leaders.
✅ Thanks! Avinash team will reach out within 24 hours.'}).catch(function(e){f.outerHTML='Something went wrong. WhatsApp +91 8793630001
'});return false;">Select ServiceKeynote / Motivational SpeakingLeadership Development TrainingTeam Building WorkshopManager DevelopmentEmployee TrainingBook Avinash Now →Or WhatsApp directly: +91 87936 30001
Avinash Chate TEDx Speaker · Founder, The Future Corporate · Author of Stars at India Inc. Avinash has trained the Indian Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW Steel and 1000+ corporate leaders across India. His work focuses on leadership, emotional intelligence and behavioural training rooted in Indian values and modern business needs. |
In a tense, high-pressure match, Pakistan captain Sarfaraz Ahmed and his team's wicketkeeper had a misunderstanding over field placement or a missed catch. Instead of resolving it quietly, both let their frustration show openly, shouting and blaming each other in front of the whole team.
The anger did not stay contained to the two men involved. It spread through the team. Misfields and missed catches followed, teammates grew unsettled, and the side that should have been pulling together looked divided. Those compounding errors are widely seen as a key reason Pakistan lost the match.
Emotional hijacking is when your amygdala, the brain's threat-detection centre, floods your body with stress hormones and effectively takes over from your rational, prefrontal-cortex thinking. In that state you react instead of respond — shouting, blaming, or making impulsive decisions you regret once you calm down.
Start with emotional awareness — notice your triggers before they fire. Use the gap between impulse and action to pause, breathe, and choose your response instead of reacting automatically. Leaders who model this calm under pressure protect not just their own decisions but their entire team's performance.
Corporate Training · Leadership Development · Team Building · Motivational Speaking · All service locations
← Back to all articles · Book Avinash Chate
By Avinash Chate — Maharashtra’s #1 Corporate Trainer & Motivational Speaker. .