Top Indian management institute leadership study

    A top Indian management institute studied how a leader's emotional style shapes an entire organisation — and found warmth combined with strength wins, while rigidity fails even in disciplined organisations.

    Top Indian management institute leadership study

    Top Indian Management Institute Leadership Study: What Really Separates Great Leaders From Average Ones

    A top Indian management institute once ran a study that should be required reading for every manager who thinks being "strict" is the same as being "effective." The finding was simple, almost embarrassingly so: the most successful leaders were not the toughest or the most controlling — they were the ones who combined a people-friendly emotional style with strong, decisive leadership. The ones who ruled by fear, rigidity and control? They failed, even inside organisations famous for discipline.

    In short

    Where this sits on your Winning Kite

    Leadership is Trait #25 — the final trait on the EQ (Emotional Intelligence) side of your Winning Kite (KITE Leadership Framework). It's deliberately placed last in the EQ cluster because leadership is where every other EQ trait — emotional awareness, self-control, empathy, influence — gets tested in public, under pressure, with other people's careers on the line. You can be self-aware in private. Leadership is EQ performed out loud, in front of a team that is watching your every mood.

    The study: what a top Indian management institute actually found

    The research is straightforward to describe and startling to absorb. A top Indian management institute studied how a leader's emotional approach affects an organisation — not their strategy documents, not their qualifications, not their years of experience. Their emotional approach. How they showed up, day after day, in front of their people.

    The finding: the most successful leaders combined a people-friendly style with strong leadership. Not one or the other. Both, together. Effective leaders were positive, outgoing, expressive, and approachable. They were also more trusting and kind than the average leader. On the other side of the ledger, less successful leaders were rigid, negative, and controlling. And here's the part that should unsettle anyone who believes discipline and strictness are the same thing: their emotional style didn't work well, even in highly disciplined organisations. Rigidity wasn't rescued by structure. It failed regardless of how tight the systems around it were.

    Think about what that means for the average Indian workplace, where "strict boss" is still worn as a badge of seriousness. A manufacturing plant head who barks orders. A finance controller who never smiles because "this is a professional environment." A sales VP who thinks warmth is weakness. The study says: you are not disciplined. You are simply ineffective, and your discipline is covering for it.

    The ripple effect: how one person's mood becomes everyone's mood

    Here is the mechanism behind the finding, and it's one I bring up in almost every leadership workshop I run: leaders act as mirrors. They reflect emotion outward, and the group absorbs it. Share positive emotion as a leader, and you guide the group in the right direction, creating a supportive environment where people actually want to solve problems together. Fail to do that, and you risk making your people unhappy and quietly disconnected — present in the meeting, absent in spirit.

    Because leaders hold disproportionate power in a room, their emotions carry disproportionate weight. People mimic their leader, often without realising it. A CEO who walks into the office irritated on a Monday morning doesn't just have a bad Monday — they hand that irritation to their direct reports, who hand a diluted version to their teams, who hand a further diluted version to the shop floor or the support desk. By the time it reaches the newest employee three levels down, nobody can trace where the bad mood started. They just know the whole place feels tense.

    This is the "ripple effect" the study points to: the leadership emotional tone applies to any organisation with a hierarchy — which is every organisation. The leader's emotional tone affects those directly below them, and that tone ripples further down, layer by layer. It is crucial for leaders to be aware of their emotional impact and to deliberately develop the emotional intelligence needed to manage it, because when leaders set a positive tone, it creates a cycle of positivity and collaboration. When they set a negative one, it creates a cycle of negativity and mistrust that is much harder to reverse than it was to create.

    I think of the Ambanis, the Tatas, the founders I've watched build billion-rupee companies from a single office — the ones who lasted decades did not lead by fear alone. They built cultures where positive tone survived leadership transitions because it had been embedded, not just performed. The ones who led purely through control built organisations that fractured the moment the controlling hand was removed.

    A leader's emotional charisma: authenticity over performance

    There's a temptation, once you learn that a warm emotional tone works, to try to fake it. Smile more in meetings. Say encouraging things you don't mean. The research — and my own experience training over a thousand corporate leaders across India — says that doesn't work either.

    Leaders who possess genuine emotional charisma inspire and captivate others through their ability to express strong emotions convincingly. And convincing requires sincerity. They communicate not just through their words but through their whole body — facial expressions, voice, gestures. Conveying emotion convincingly requires true belief in the message being delivered. Leaders who act from authentic belief are perceived as charismatic. Leaders who are manipulative or performing warmth without believing it are, sooner or later, seen through — and once a team senses insincerity in its leader, trust doesn't come back easily.

    I've seen this play out with two team leads in an Indian software company — call them Ravi and Priya, a comparison I use often in workshops because it's so instantly recognisable. Ravi, known for genuine emotional charisma, consistently shared positive emotion with his team, and he meant it. He was honest in his communication and used his body language, his tone, his presence to inspire people rather than manage them. His team felt motivated, worked together effectively, and delivered a successful project. Priya, by contrast, was not attuned to her own emotions and struggled to create a positive atmosphere. She was often perceived as insincere, even manipulative, and that perception cost her the trust of her team. Collaboration suffered, deadlines slipped, and the project outcomes reflected it. Same company. Same resources. Two entirely different emotional operating systems — and two entirely different results.

    Mina and Arjun: the cost-cutting test that reveals a leader's true style

    The clearest illustration I use of this whole idea is a story of two leaders — Mina, a caring CEO, and Arjun, a strict manager — both facing the exact same problem at the exact same time: cutting costs in their companies.

    Mina took the compassionate route. She understood how her decisions would land emotionally on her employees before she made them. She involved her team in the decision-making process rather than announcing cuts from above, and she found ways to reduce expenses that didn't gut morale in the process. The result: she kept a positive atmosphere in the company, and she kept her people loyal and engaged through a genuinely hard period.

    Arjun focused solely on hitting his cost-cutting targets. He didn't factor in how his decisions would land on his team's emotions — he treated the exercise as a spreadsheet problem, not a people problem. His strict, top-down approach led to high employee turnover and low morale in his department, and that, in turn, hindered the overall success of the company he was supposedly protecting by cutting costs in the first place.

    Same pressure. Same business necessity. Opposite outcomes — because the emotional approach to a hard decision matters as much as the decision itself.

    Balancing task-orientation and people-orientation

    None of this means a leader should avoid being tough. The study, and the pattern I see repeatedly in Indian organisations — from the Army units and BRO teams I've trained to corporate floors at RBI, BARC and JSW — is that the best leaders balance both. They are task-oriented enough to hold people accountable, and people-oriented enough that accountability doesn't curdle into fear.

    The best leaders create a positive emotional environment that spreads through the organisation, producing a more open, more communicative atmosphere. They're warm, outgoing, emotionally expressive, democratic and trusting, and they actively encourage their teams to stay connected — to each other and to them. They're flexible on minor rules and invest more in building personal bonds and a shared identity, sometimes through something as simple as a team lunch or a festival celebration, rather than micromanaging every process. That combination produces higher morale and better performance, consistently.

    Mediocre leaders do the opposite. They're rigid, inflexible, distant and irritable, with little visible concern for their team's wellbeing or for the emotional climate of the place they run. And crucially, being assertive when it's genuinely needed is not the same as being rigid all the time. Assertiveness is necessary — addressing issues directly, setting high standards, monitoring performance honestly, giving direct feedback. Picture a manager whose team keeps arriving late and unprepared to meetings. The right response is direct: "I can't accept this behaviour. I'm postponing this meeting for two days. Be on time and be prepared, or there'll be hell to pay." That's assertive, not cruel. It's clear, it's fair, and it's delivered without a permanent scowl attached to it.

    The failure mode is constancy — being tough and rigid all the time, regardless of context, because that's simply who you've decided to be as a leader. That constant rigidity is what creates the negative emotional tone that ripples through the whole organisation and, per the study, undermines even well-disciplined systems.

    Feedback: the other place emotional style shows up

    Assertiveness also shows up in how a leader gives feedback. When someone consistently underperforms despite genuine attempts at development, the gap has to be confronted directly and openly — avoiding it doesn't help anyone, least of all the employee who deserves clarity about where they stand. But the feedback should be constructive, specific and helpful, and if it's negative, it belongs in private, not in front of the team. That single distinction — public praise, private correction — is one of the simplest, most reliable signals of a leader's emotional maturity, and it costs nothing to apply.

    Why this matters even more when times get hard

    During difficult periods — a slow quarter, a restructuring, a client loss — leaders need to draw on whatever reserve of goodwill they've built up over time. Leaders who've genuinely built relationships with their team can call on that reserve and inspire people to work harder through the tough stretch, because the team trusts that the leader has their back the rest of the time too. Leaders who haven't built that relationship push their people away with ruthless, purely transactional behaviour precisely when they need loyalty the most.

    One mark of a mature leader is the ability to keep the raw, unrestrained pursuit of personal power under control. Leaders who pair self-control with real impact are more likely to succeed in large organisations over the long run. Personal ambition isn't the problem — ambition focused purely on individual gain rather than collective goals is.

    How to apply this at work, starting Monday

    This research isn't abstract. Here's how I coach leaders to put it into practice immediately:

    Daniel Goleman's research on emotional intelligence in leadership arrives at a similar conclusion from a different angle — that the emotional tone a leader sets is often a stronger predictor of team performance than their technical strategy. I mention it here only as a supporting signal; the Winning Kite framework and the specific mechanics above are how I teach this in the room, because Indian workplaces have their own texture, their own hierarchy sensitivities, and their own version of what "strict" gets mistaken for "effective."

    If you want to go deeper on how Leadership connects to the other 24 EQ traits, and how EQ itself connects to RQ and PQ to lift overall Success, explore the full Winning Kite (KITE Leadership Framework). And if you're building this capability across a management team, our Signature Corporate Training Programs and the broader Corporate Training Topics catalogue both go deep on applied leadership and emotional intelligence for Indian organisations.

    Bring These Ideas to Your Team

    Avinash Chate turns the traits in Stars at India Inc. into live leadership & emotional-intelligence workshops. TEDx speaker · 11+ yrs training Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW & 1000+ leaders.

    ✅ Thanks! Avinash team will reach out within 24 hours.

    '}).catch(function(e){f.outerHTML='

    Something went wrong. WhatsApp +91 8793630001

    '});return false;">Select ServiceKeynote / Motivational SpeakingLeadership Development TrainingTeam Building WorkshopManager DevelopmentEmployee TrainingBook Avinash Now →

    Or WhatsApp directly: +91 87936 30001

    Work with Avinash Chate

    Avinash Chate

    TEDx Speaker · Founder, The Future Corporate · Author of Stars at India Inc.

    Avinash has trained the Indian Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW Steel and 1000+ corporate leaders across India. His work focuses on leadership, emotional intelligence and behavioural training rooted in Indian values and modern business needs.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What did the top Indian management institute leadership study actually find?

    The study found that the most successful leaders combined a people-friendly emotional style with strong, assertive leadership. Effective leaders were positive, outgoing, expressive, approachable, trusting and kind. Less successful leaders were rigid, negative and controlling — and that emotional style failed even inside highly disciplined organisations.

    What is the "ripple effect" of a leader's emotional tone?

    The ripple effect is how a leader's emotional state spreads downward through every level of the hierarchy. A positive, engaged leader creates a cycle of positivity and collaboration in the team below them. A negative, uncooperative leader creates a cycle of mistrust and disengagement — and both patterns cascade further down to every layer under them.

    Can a leader be both tough and emotionally warm?

    Yes — and the study suggests this combination is what actually works. The best leaders balance task-orientation with people-orientation. They are assertive when addressing performance issues or missed deadlines, but they pair that assertiveness with warmth, openness and genuine listening, rather than constant rigidity and control.

    Where does leadership sit on the Winning Kite framework?

    Leadership is Trait #25 on the EQ (left) side of the Winning Kite — the final and culminating trait of Emotional Intelligence. It sits alongside RQ (Relationship Intelligence, right side) and PQ (Productivity, bottom) to lift Success (the top of the kite). A leader with high EQ but weak RQ or PQ still won't fly steadily.

    Related Articles by Avinash Chate

    Avinash Chate services

    Corporate Training · Leadership Development · Team Building · Motivational Speaking · All service locations

    ← Back to all articles · Book Avinash Chate

    By Avinash Chate — Maharashtra’s #1 Corporate Trainer & Motivational Speaker. .