Sarah's Leadership Struggle

    Sarah was promoted for her skill, then nearly broke her team by refusing to delegate. Here's how accurate self-assessment — Trait #2 on the EQ side of the Winning Kite — turned her leadership around.

    Sarah's Leadership Struggle

    Sarah's Leadership Struggle

    Sarah was promoted because she was good at her job. Six months later, her team was falling apart around her — and she had no idea why. This is the story of what accurate self-assessment could have saved her from, and what it can save you from too.

    In short

    Where this sits on your Winning Kite

    Every leader I train stands on a kite with four sides — EQ, RQ, PQ, and Success at the top. Accurate self-assessment is the second trait on the EQ (left) side of the Winning Kite (KITE Leadership Framework), sitting right after emotional awareness. You cannot fly a kite that is strong on one side and thin on the other three — and Sarah's story is exactly what happens when a leader is strong on competence but has never built the self-assessment muscle that competence alone cannot replace.

    The Promotion That Looked Like a Reward

    Sarah's story is one I come back to often in my leadership sessions because it is so ordinary — which is exactly why it is so dangerous. She gets promoted to a leadership role in her department. On paper, everything checks out. She has the technical skills. She has the track record. She has the experience. Her organisation looks at her performance as an individual contributor and makes the completely natural — and completely flawed — assumption that the same skills that made her good at her job will make her good at leading people who do that job.

    Sarah believes it too. She walks into her new role convinced she has everything she needs. That confidence is not arrogance — it is simply the absence of an honest inventory. Nobody sat her down and asked, "What are you actually good at, and what have you never had to be good at until now?" And Sarah never asked herself either.

    What she fails to recognise — because she has never been forced to look — is that she has real weaknesses in two specific areas: communication and delegation. As an individual contributor, these weaknesses were invisible. You do not need to delegate when you only manage your own work. You do not need to communicate expectations across a team when the only person you are coordinating with is yourself. The promotion did not create these weaknesses. It simply removed the camouflage that had been hiding them for years.

    The Slow Collapse

    Here is where the story turns painfully predictable. Sarah takes on too much work herself. When a task looks like it might not get done to her standard, instead of coaching a team member through it or having a direct conversation about expectations, she quietly pulls it back onto her own plate. She tells herself she is being a responsible leader, "just helping out," "making sure things don't slip." In reality, she is avoiding two things she has never had to practise — trusting someone else with the outcome, and having the sometimes-uncomfortable conversation that real delegation requires.

    She struggles to delegate tasks in any structured way. There is no clear handoff, no clarity on ownership, no follow-up rhythm — because delegation was never a skill she had to build. And because she is now doing her old job and trying to do everyone else's oversight at the same time, she becomes overwhelmed. Her calendar fills up. Her replies get shorter. Her presence in the team gets thinner even as her workload gets heavier.

    Her team feels the effects long before Sarah does. They feel frustrated and undervalued. Tasks they could have owned get quietly taken away from them, which tells them, without a word being said, "I don't trust you with this." Nobody explains why decisions are being made a certain way, because Sarah is too buried to communicate clearly. The natural result follows: delays creep in, productivity declines, and the department that was performing well before her promotion starts to visibly slip.

    This is the cruelest part of Sarah's story — and the part every new manager needs to hear. Sarah's lack of accurate self-assessment prevents her from seeing the impact of her own actions. She is not a bad person, and she is not lazy or careless. She is working harder than anyone on her team. But because she has never honestly evaluated her own blind spots, she cannot connect her exhaustion, her team's frustration, and the department's declining numbers back to the same root cause: she is leading the way she used to individually-contribute, and it does not scale.

    The Intervention — and the Turn

    It is only when her supervisor steps in that anything changes. The supervisor does not fire Sarah, and does not simply tell her to "do better." The supervisor intervenes directly and provides training — naming the specific gaps (communication, delegation) instead of leaving Sarah to guess what is going wrong. That specificity matters enormously. Vague feedback like "you need to be a better leader" would have left Sarah exactly where she started. Precise feedback — "here is what you're not doing, and here is what it's costing your team" — gives her something she can actually act on.

    And to Sarah's credit, once she can see it, she does something with it. She does not get defensive. She does not blame her team for "not stepping up." She works on improving her communication and delegation skills — deliberately, not accidentally. She practises handing off tasks with clear expectations. She practises explaining her reasoning out loud instead of assuming her team will infer it. Over time, she becomes a more effective and respected leader — not because her competence changed, but because her self-awareness finally caught up to her new responsibility.

    That is the entire arc of accurate self-assessment in one sentence: the skill itself rarely needs to change as much as the honesty about where the skill is missing.

    Why Competence Alone Cannot Carry a Leader

    I see Sarah's pattern constantly in Indian corporates — in IT, in manufacturing, in banking, in family businesses handing leadership to the next generation. The best salesperson gets made sales manager. The best engineer gets made tech lead. The best trainer at a coaching centre decides to open their own institute. In every one of these jumps, the organisation — and the individual — assumes that being excellent at the work is the same as being excellent at leading people who do the work. It rarely is.

    This is closely related to another story I tell in the same chapter — of trainers at a software training centre who, after a year of success, start believing "hum chala lenge," that they alone are why the business works. What they miss is that the business succeeds because of marketing, reputation, owner strategy and a dozen moving parts they never had to manage themselves. Like Sarah, their competence in one domain quietly convinces them they don't need to assess themselves honestly in the domain they are about to step into. Being an expert in a subject does not automatically make you successful at running a team, or a business — because those are different games entirely, and only accurate self-assessment tells you which game you're actually playing.

    Contrast this with Jitesh, another example from this same chapter — a software developer assigned a project in a language he doesn't know. Instead of pretending, instead of quietly struggling the way Sarah did, Jitesh acknowledges his limitation to his supervisor immediately and enrolls in training to close the gap. The difference between Jitesh and early-stage Sarah isn't talent. It's that Jitesh assessed himself accurately before the gap became a crisis, and Sarah only did it after.

    The Tendulkar-Kambli Lesson Behind Sarah's Story

    There is no better real-world illustration of this trait than two boys who grew up together at Shivaji Park under coach Ramakant Achrekar, and once put on a world-record 664-run school partnership: Sachin Tendulkar and Vinod Kambli. Both were hailed as the future of Indian cricket. Their careers went in opposite directions almost entirely because of this one trait.

    Tendulkar debuted for India at 16, and became known for meticulous preparation and continuous self-improvement. After a rough patch in 2006, he reinvented his own batting technique — an act of brutal, accurate self-assessment on a player already considered the best in the world — and went on to lead India to the 2011 World Cup and finish with 100 international centuries. Kambli, by contrast, burst onto the scene with back-to-back double centuries and a Test average of 54.20, relying heavily on natural talent. He struggled with fitness and pressure, was dropped after just 17 Tests, and later admitted publicly that he never took the game seriously enough to work on it. Tendulkar's career spanned 24 years. Kambli's spanned less than five.

    The difference was never raw ability — Kambli had that in abundance. The difference was that one of them treated self-assessment as an ongoing discipline, and the other treated talent as a permanent asset that needed no maintenance. Sarah's story is the corporate version of the same lesson: talent and skill get you the promotion. Only accurate self-assessment lets you keep it, grow into it, and lead well inside it.

    How to Build This Trait Before You Need It

    You do not have to wait for a supervisor's intervention the way Sarah did. A few practices I coach leaders through, directly connected to her story:

    This kind of honest self-inventory, done consistently, is a lighter version of what Daniel Goleman calls self-awareness as the foundation of emotional intelligence — not as a borrowed idea here, but as good company for a trait I have watched make or break hundreds of first-time managers in Indian corporates.

    From Struggling Sarah to Respected Leader

    The most important line in Sarah's story is easy to skim past: "over time, she becomes a more effective and respected leader." Not immediately. Not without discomfort. Not without someone willing to tell her the truth. But she gets there — because once she could see her own pattern clearly, she had something to actually work on.

    That is the whole promise of accurate self-assessment. It doesn't ask you to be perfect before you lead. It asks you to be honest about where you're incomplete, so the gap doesn't quietly become your team's problem to absorb. If you're stepping into a leadership role, or already in one and noticing your team feels a little like Sarah's did — frustrated, undervalued, waiting for you to notice — that's not a character flaw. It's a trait you can build, deliberately, starting this week.

    I work with leadership teams across India — through the Signature Corporate Training Programs and the full Trainings catalogue — to build exactly this muscle before it costs a team its trust the way it nearly cost Sarah hers. If you want to talk about bringing this into your organisation, get in touch.

    Bring These Ideas to Your Team

    Avinash Chate turns the traits in Stars at India Inc. into live leadership & emotional-intelligence workshops. TEDx speaker · 11+ yrs training Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW & 1000+ leaders.

    ✅ Thanks! Avinash team will reach out within 24 hours.

    '}).catch(function(e){f.outerHTML='

    Something went wrong. WhatsApp +91 8793630001

    '});return false;">Select ServiceKeynote / Motivational SpeakingLeadership Development TrainingTeam Building WorkshopManager DevelopmentEmployee TrainingBook Avinash Now →

    Or WhatsApp directly: +91 87936 30001

    Work with Avinash Chate

    Avinash Chate

    TEDx Speaker · Founder, The Future Corporate · Author of Stars at India Inc.

    Avinash has trained the Indian Army, BRO, RBI, BARC, JSW Steel and 1000+ corporate leaders across India. His work focuses on leadership, emotional intelligence and behavioural training rooted in Indian values and modern business needs.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is accurate self-assessment in leadership?

    Accurate self-assessment is the honest, objective ability to see your own strengths, weaknesses, values and limitations — without ego and without excessive self-criticism. In the Winning Kite framework, it is Trait #2 on the EQ side, and it is what turns a newly promoted manager into a leader their team actually trusts.

    Why did Sarah struggle after her promotion?

    Sarah was promoted into a leadership role and assumed her technical skill and experience were enough to lead a team. She never paused to evaluate her communication and delegation weaknesses. She took on too much work herself, could not let go of tasks, and her team grew frustrated and undervalued — until her supervisor intervened with feedback and training.

    How is accurate self-assessment different from emotional awareness?

    Emotional awareness (Trait #1) is noticing and understanding your emotions in the moment. Accurate self-assessment (Trait #2) builds on that awareness to objectively evaluate your capabilities — strengths and weaknesses — over time. You cannot accurately assess yourself if you cannot first read your own emotional reactions.

    How can a new manager avoid Sarah's mistake?

    Ask for structured feedback early instead of waiting for a crisis, use a tool like the Johari Window to uncover blind spots, actively practise delegation instead of absorbing every task, and treat every piece of feedback — compliment, advice, suggestion or criticism — as data rather than a personal attack.

    Related Articles by Avinash Chate

    Avinash Chate services

    Corporate Training · Leadership Development · Team Building · Motivational Speaking · All service locations

    ← Back to all articles · Book Avinash Chate

    By Avinash Chate — Maharashtra’s #1 Corporate Trainer & Motivational Speaker. .